Stop Impunity
Areas of Focus Montage
Internally Displaced Persons
Building a culture of accountability
  • Democraticy


    Friday, 01 August 2014 08:57
  • Stop Impunity

    Stop Impunity

    Monday, 04 August 2014 08:24
  • Areas of Focus Montage

    Areas of Focus Montage

    Monday, 04 August 2014 08:25
  • Internally Displaced Persons

    Internally Displaced Persons

    Monday, 04 August 2014 08:26
  • Building a culture of accountability

    Building a culture of accountability

    Monday, 04 August 2014 08:27

10th January, 2012/..We take great exception at  media reports that have been emerging in recent times to the effect that the ‘Ocampo Six’ will have the leeway to run for public offices notwithstanding the outcome of the confirmation process.   

These assertions are detrimental mockery to the ethical leadership dispositions and constitute clear manifestations of contempt and disregard for the Constitution. As the country awaits the decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber of the International Criminal Court (ICC), we wish to reiterate our position that the test of integrity anticipated under the Constitution must be respected by all and sundry in this country.

It cannot be right that this test is required of other caliber of state officers but trashed for political leadership including the six suspects. This is a dangerous contagious discrimination which leads to calls for appropriate action to enforce constitutional principles and values.

As a measure of this [integrity] high test, we wish to remind the people of Kenya that the Pre-Trial Chamber II itself, in issuing the summons against the suspects, was in agreement that indeed serious crimes and violations of human rights occurred in Kenya during the post election violence.  The judges, in their ruling delivered on 8th March 2011 said that “they were convinced that there existed reasonable grounds to believe that the suspects are criminally responsible for the charges filed against them”.

Paragraph 56 of the ruling read as follows, “In view of the foregoing, the Chamber is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that [the suspects] are criminally responsible as indirect co-perpetrators under article 25(3)(a) …for the following acts constituting crimes against humanity committed from on or about 24 January 2008 until 31 January 2008…”

It further held the view that the material elements of such violations against the suspects exist, which is what informed the decision to summon them. As many will recall, even the then dissenting judgment of Judge Hans-Peter Kaul never disputed existence of criminal culpability of the suspects but rather jurisdiction of ICC in the following terms;

“…I have no doubt that the crimes alleged in the Application concerning [the suspects] fall within the competence of the criminal justice authorities of the Republic of Kenya as a matter to be investigated and prosecuted under Kenyan criminal law. It is essentially on this point alone that I must separate myself from the Majority of the Chamber. As I am of the considered view that the Court lacks jurisdiction ratione materiae…”

The forthcoming decision of the Pre-Trial Chamber, regardless of the way it goes, cannot conclusively determine criminal involvement of the suspects on matters that Kenyan institutions have jurisdiction.

It would, therefore, be deceitful and inappropriate for the country to whitewash these historical aspects of culpability regardless of the decision of the ICC.  Relevant authorities must initiate concurrent domestic processes that will independently and objectively investigate and conduct prosecutions of all those perceived to have perpetrated crimes during the PEV, including the six suspects.   Until that is done, and bearing in mind the evidence against them, we cannot objectively pronounce their innocence.

In addition, we urge that ends of justice for PEV victims must be served through our local justice systems as well if we are to decisively address prevalent impunity in Kenya. For the government to appear to adopt a wait-and-see approach on the ICC instead of exercising its statutory responsibility to compliment the court through local action is yet another manifestation of impunity.

In conclusion, we call on the suspects themselves to live by the constitution by stepping aside from their public offices until they are conclusively cleared of any criminal liability locally and by the ICC.  In our view, their reluctance to step aside thus far casts serious doubt on their individual judgment to hold public offices. It runs contrary to basic tenets of good governance.

 Signed By

Ndung’u Wainaina

Executive Director

International Center for Policy and Conflict

President Uhuru Kenyatta and the Jubilee Regime Sh...

Friday, May 29, 2015/..International Center for Policy and Conflict (ICPC) expresses its deep concern that President Uhuru Kenyatta’s intolerant regime is alarmingly shrinking the space of civil [ ... ]

Al Shabaab Targeting and Killing Police Officers

TUESDAY, May 26, 2015/......  International Center for Policy and Conflict (ICPC) strongly condemns the horrible, cowardly and despicable Al Shabaab terrorist attack in Yumbis area of Garissa Cou [ ... ]

Police Vetting Lacks Thoroughness; It Is a Whitewa...

Nairobi, Kenya Friday 6March 2015/..The National Police Service Commission (NPSC) has not exhibited the thoroughness of vetting police officers. While the source of massive wealth is of great impo [ ... ]

Address Corruption in Kenya: Fix Systemic Institut...

Nairobi, Kenya, 10 March 2014/…Kenya is significantly turning into an international corruption paradise. Corruption will never be addressed if the presidency does not lead from the frontline wit [ ... ]

Electoral Commission must step in to clean-up Ken...

Nairobi, Kenya March 17, 2015/…International Center for Policy and Conflict (ICPC) is deeply concerned with the widespread concern about the prevalence of corruption in the country especially in [ ... ]

Jubilee Government Delegation unsubstantiated Cla...

Nairobi, Kenya Friday, January 30, 2015/…Jubilee Government policy, both locally and internationally, fail to embrace culture of accountability that stigmatizes impunity. It articulates and acts [ ... ]

ICPC calls for establishment of new capable, credi...

In POST Kabete MP cold murder and British Court sentencing of corrupt company’s directors linked to Kenya public institutions’ corruption deals,  with little progress in arresting culprits, i [ ... ]

ICPC Welcomes High Court ruling on Security Laws;...

Nairobi, Kenya February 24, 2015/.. International Center for Policy and Conflict (ICPC) commends the Kenya Judiciary for upholding the constitutional fundamental rights and freedoms by striking do [ ... ]

Failure to implement integrated transformation sou...

September 17, 2014/…International Center for Policy and Conflict (ICPC) notes that the Inspector General of the National Police Service of Kenya David Kimaiyo has urged police units to work in h [ ... ]

Kenya Situation ICC Cases and future of the Court

Nairobi, Kenya, September 6, 2014/...The International Criminal Court (ICC) was established following gravest of crimes committed in Rwanda and the former Republic of Yugoslavia. To the shame of t [ ... ]

ISouth Sudan: More than 30 organizations call for ...

5th September 2014/…More than 30 South Sudanese and international organizations have signed a petition that will be delivered to the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), callin [ ... ]

International Center for Policy and Conflict’s Spe...

To:                                                                                               5th S [ ... ]